The Capability Gaps Hiding in Plain Sight

There's a moment that happens in almost every organization I work with. A leader, usually someone smart, experienced, and well-intentioned, looks at me and says, "I know what I should be doing. I just can't seem to do it consistently when things get intense."

That's the gap.

The issue isn't that leaders don't know what to do. It's that they haven't built the capability to do it under pressure. Most have never practiced the habits that leadership really demands: navigating ambiguity, influencing across power dynamics, having tough conversations, and aligning teams in real time.

Six Signs Your Leadership System Isn't Working

Over the years, our team has identified six patterns that signal a leadership system is breaking down. If any of these feel familiar, it's time to look beyond individual performance and examine the infrastructure supporting your leaders.

1. Leaders struggle to see beyond their function
They make decisions that optimize for their team but create bottlenecks everywhere else. They're solving local problems without understanding the ripple effects across the organization.

2. Influence gets mistaken for clarity
Real influence is less about volume or charisma, and more about changing how people think and helping them see what they couldn't see before. Without a shared understanding of what influence actually means, loudness wins.

3. Conflict either gets avoided or escalated
Teams tiptoe around tension until it explodes, or they escalate disagreements into personal battles. Leaders have never been taught how to name dynamics, reset conversations, or stay curious under pressure.

4. Culture looks good on paper, but it doesn't show up in behavior
The values are on the wall, but day-to-day decisions don't reflect stated priorities. Without senior modeling and reinforcement, culture stays aspirational.

5. Leaders wait for clarity
In environments that require decisive action through ambiguity, leaders hesitate. They want more data, more alignment, more certainty before they move. Meanwhile, momentum stalls.

6. The C-suite doesn't operate as a team
Executives optimize for their own functions, compete for resources, and avoid accountability. Silos fracture decision-making, and that dysfunction trickles down to every level.

Leadership Capability Isn't Built in a Classroom

Most organizations treat leadership development like an event instead of a system. They send leaders to a workshop. The content is great. People leave energized. But by Monday, it's business as usual.

Think about it this way: Promoting a strong technical performer into a people leader without support is like handing someone a complex system with no schematics and asking them to make it scale.

Engineers don't rely on instinct alone to build things that last. They design systems, test assumptions, and build feedback loops so small issues don't become structural failures. But when it comes to leadership, many organizations still rely on hope and heroics.

What a Real Leadership System Looks Like

When leadership behavior is reinforced daily through systems, shared expectations, and strategic modeling, it scales across the organization. A real leadership system includes:

  • Senior modeling and strategic alignment: Leadership systems don't work unless they're modeled at the top

  • Evergreen rituals and learning loops: Leadership development baked into the rhythms of the business: 1:1s, team check-ins, strategy sessions

  • Shared language that sustains under pressure: Tools to name dynamics, navigate tension, and reset without escalation

  • Real work integration: Leaders practice new skills in the meetings, conversations, and decisions they face every day

The Shift Is Already Happening

At a time when 56% of C-suite leaders are likely to leave in the next two years, the most effective leaders aren't just pitching programs – they're building systems.

The shift is already happening. The only question is: will you lead it, or continue to take the blame when things break down?

Next
Next

The Promotion Paradox: Why Your Best Engineers Make Struggling Managers